1. Introduction

The digital world is full of threats, mainly considering the Internet environment. We can detect these threats in different ways, such as by analyzing attacks and infections of real users. However, in the previously described case, the attacker succeeded, and we work with data from uncontrolled and heterogeneous victims, which is not the best scenario.

So, we can set up honeypots to avoid unpredictability and get prepared to catch specific information about malware and others threats. This strategy facilitates the analysis and creation of countermeasures for different digital threats.

In this tutorial, we’ll study honeypots. First, we’ll briefly review some core concepts about digital threats and malware. So, we’ll investigate what honeypots are, conceptually and technically. Finally, we’ll get some examples of real honeypots.

2. Digital Threats and Malware

With the popularization of computing and the Internet, malicious entities appeared with different strategies to attack digital environments. We call these strategies of digital threats. Moreover, it is relevant to highlight that malicious entities usually move attacks aiming for personal or financial advantages.

Among the most common digital threats, we can cite denial of service attacks, man-in-the-middle attacks, phishing, scanning, and malware.

Some of these digital threats use networked connections to the attack, the case of denial of service and man-in-the-middle ones. Other ones aim to get information about the victims and their computing systems, such as phishing and scanning. Finally, specific threats have a broad set of different objectives, such as malware.

In particular, malware emerged at the begging of computing and got more frequent as it evolved; they are malicious software that runs in the victim’s devices for different purposes, which the most common ones are:

  • Steal or make data unavailable
  • Destroy files or systems installed in the victim’s device
  • Creating backdoors, thus acting as enablers for other threats

So, digital threats, especially malware, are dangerous, and we need methods to get information about them to investigate their behaviors and create efficient countermeasures. That is where honeypots come up, as we’ll study in the following sections.

3. Honeypots

Conceptually, a honeypot consists of a network-attached resource designed to bring the attention of hackers and other malicious entities. So, honeypots provide deliberately insecure services with apparently valuable information on them. However, both the service and the data on it are not authentic.

In such a way, honeypots trick malicious entities, which attack them by trying to steal data, make the service unavailable, break the system, or get some particular advantage.

But, instead of carrying valuable information or providing relevant services, honeypots are equipped with several tracking and analysis tools. Thus, the honeypot owner can identify an attack, let it happen for a given time, stop it, and analyze how it worked in the honeypot. This process allows the owners to get information and plan defensive actions against potential threats affecting their production systems.

Furthermore, some honeypots can identify the origin of malicious attacks, thus blocking and including these origins in public blacklists. The overall operation of a honeypot is summarized in the following figure:


It is relevant to highlight that there are two main challenges regarding the development of honeypots:

  • Make the honeypot seem authentic: the honeypot must have a persuasive computing system, applications, and data. So, creating and maintaining a honeypot may be difficult and incur several capital and operational costs
  • Isolate the honeypot: we should completely isolate the honeypot from the production systems. Once attacked, we should guarantee that the malicious entities will not get access to any authentic program or data

Moreover, even with a well-designed and well-implemented honeypot, advanced hackers may detect that they are breaking a fake system. So, we should also consider the possibility of attackers giving up the attack, thus avoiding disclosing its details.

3.1. Honeypot Categories

We have some different categories of honeypots. These categories, in turn, differ honeypots according to their implementations and objectives. For example, regarding the main objective of deploying a honeypot, we can highlight the categories of research and production:

  • Research Honeypots: in summary, implemented and deployed by research and development teams. These honeypots aim to closely analyze the activity of malicious entities trying to find effective ways to get protected from them
  • Production Honeypots: commonly deployed in public and private organizations. This category of honeypots aims to avoid malicious entities getting access to genuine resources, delaying them, and giving time to the systems administrators to mitigate the attack

Other categorizations segregate honeypots based on the threat they try to avoid or expose. In such a scenario, the usual categories are spam, malware, database, and spider:

  • Spam Honeypots: traps for catching spam messages before delivering them to legitimate e-mail boxes
  • Malware Honeypots: analyzers that provide a vulnerable environment for being attacked by malware software. These honeypots aim to detect malicious patterns for creating vaccines against the attacking malware
  • Database Honeypots: traps for keeping attackers occupied with apparently sensitive data. Thus, administrators can investigate their attacking methods to secure relevant databases against them
  • Spider Honeypots: consist of fake web pages for attracting web crawlers. In such a manner, administrators can analyze the crawlers to block malicious ones

In addition to the previously presented categories, we can also classify honeypots according to the particular technology or software explored by them. For example, we can have honeypots tailored to work with HTTP, WordPress, and IoT, among others.

3.2. Benefits vs. Risks

In short, we can conclude that honeypots are truly beneficial since they enable the IT team to detect and deal with several digital threats. It is true. In addition to that, we can also cite the following points as benefits of implementing honeypots:

  • Analyze actual (and potentially real-time collected) malicious data samples
  • Reduce the risks of false-positive detections
  • Cost-effective method to customize and improve security systems

However, there are also potential drawbacks and risks associated with deploying honeypots. We can see some of them next:

  • If no or few attacks occur in the honeypot, we’ll have limited information for analysis
  • Experienced attackers can distinguish a honeypot from a production system, avoiding them
  • Since we deploy honeypots together with the production system, attackers may exploit them to access the latter
  • Honeypots require a specialized team to maintain, which represents a recurrent operational cost

In short, research entities and other organizations should evaluate the benefits and risks in their specific context before deploying a honeypot in their systems. If well-designed and implemented, honeypots represent a pretty good security tool. Otherwise, however, they can create backdoors and reduce the security levels of the digital systems.

4. Real-World Honeypots Examples

There are several honeypot base implementations currently available. Thus, we can import and customize such implementations to deploy in multiple different systems. Let’s see some of these implementations next:

  • Kippo: a secure shell honeypot tailored to detect login brute force attacks and log shell commands executed by the attacker
  • Glasstopf: an HTTP-based honeypot designed to detect web application attacks
  • Wordpot: a honeypot to detect malicious signatures in plugins, themes, and other resources provided for WordPress
  • HoneyMySQL: a simple SQL honeypot to keep the attention of attackers while securing sensitive data in a private database
  • Honeymail: a honeypot solution to detect and take countermeasures against SMTP-based attacks

Of course, we presented only a few samples of honeypot implementations. There are many other alternatives for tackling the same resources and technologies as the previously discussed honeypots. Furthermore, we have honeypot implementations for purposes other than the cited ones. Examples are honeypots for detecting malicious shell codes and attacks regarding printers, FTP, and NTP.

5. Conclusion

In this tutorial, we investigated honeypots. First, we briefly reviewed the characteristics of digital threats and malware. So, we deeply explored relevant notions, categories, benefits, and risks of honeypots. Finally, we saw some real-world implementations of honeypots.

We can conclude that honeypots represent an efficient alternative for avoiding and studying malicious attacks. However, honeypots require well-done maintenance keeping them updated and with no backdoors to the production systems they secure.

Comments are open for 30 days after publishing a post. For any issues past this date, use the Contact form on the site.