Java Top

I just announced the new Learn Spring course, focused on the fundamentals of Spring 5 and Spring Boot 2:


1. Overview

ExecutorService is a framework provided by the JDK which simplifies the execution of tasks in asynchronous mode. Generally speaking, ExecutorService automatically provides a pool of threads and API for assigning tasks to it.

Further reading:

Guide to the Fork/Join Framework in Java

An intro to the fork/join framework presented in Java 7 and the tools to help speed up parallel processing by attempting to use all available processor cores.

Overview of the java.util.concurrent

Discover the content of the java.util.concurrent package.

Guide to java.util.concurrent.Locks

In this article, we explore various implementations of the Lock interface and the newly introduced in Java 9 StampedLock class.

2. Instantiating ExecutorService

2.1. Factory Methods of the Executors Class

The easiest way to create ExecutorService is to use one of the factory methods of the Executors class.

For example, the following line of code will create a thread-pool with 10 threads:

ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);

The are several other factory methods to create predefined ExecutorService that meet specific use cases. To find the best method for your needs, consult Oracle's official documentation.

2.2. Directly Create an ExecutorService

Because ExecutorService is an interface, an instance of any its implementations can be used. There are several implementations to choose from in the java.util.concurrent package or you can create your own.

For example, the ThreadPoolExecutor class has a few constructors which can be used to configure an executor service and its internal pool.

ExecutorService executorService = 
  new ThreadPoolExecutor(1, 1, 0L, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS,   
  new LinkedBlockingQueue<Runnable>());

You may notice that the code above is very similar to the source code of the factory method newSingleThreadExecutor(). For most cases, a detailed manual configuration isn't necessary.

3. Assigning Tasks to the ExecutorService

ExecutorService can execute Runnable and Callable tasks. To keep things simple in this article, two primitive tasks will be used. Notice that lambda expressions are used here instead of anonymous inner classes:

Runnable runnableTask = () -> {
    try {
    } catch (InterruptedException e) {

Callable<String> callableTask = () -> {
    return "Task's execution";

List<Callable<String>> callableTasks = new ArrayList<>();

Tasks can be assigned to the ExecutorService using several methods, including execute(), which is inherited from the Executor interface, and also submit(), invokeAny(), invokeAll().

The execute() method is void, and it doesn't give any possibility to get the result of task's execution or to check the task's status (is it running or executed).


submit() submits a Callable or a Runnable task to an ExecutorService and returns a result of type Future.

Future<String> future = 

invokeAny() assigns a collection of tasks to an ExecutorService, causing each to be executed, and returns the result of a successful execution of one task (if there was a successful execution).

String result = executorService.invokeAny(callableTasks);

invokeAll() assigns a collection of tasks to an ExecutorService, causing each to be executed, and returns the result of all task executions in the form of a list of objects of type Future.

List<Future<String>> futures = executorService.invokeAll(callableTasks);

Now, before going any further, two more things must be discussed: shutting down an ExecutorService and dealing with Future return types.

4. Shutting Down an ExecutorService

In general, the ExecutorService will not be automatically destroyed when there is no task to process. It will stay alive and wait for new work to do.

In some cases this is very helpful; for example, if an app needs to process tasks that appear on an irregular basis or the quantity of these tasks is not known at compile time.

On the other hand, an app could reach its end, but it will not be stopped because a waiting ExecutorService will cause the JVM to keep running.

To properly shut down an ExecutorService, we have the shutdown() and shutdownNow() APIs.

The shutdown() method doesn't cause immediate destruction of the ExecutorService. It will make the ExecutorService stop accepting new tasks and shut down after all running threads finish their current work.


The shutdownNow() method tries to destroy the ExecutorService immediately, but it doesn't guarantee that all the running threads will be stopped at the same time. This method returns a list of tasks that are waiting to be processed. It is up to the developer to decide what to do with these tasks.

List<Runnable> notExecutedTasks = executorService.shutDownNow();

One good way to shut down the ExecutorService (which is also recommended by Oracle) is to use both of these methods combined with the awaitTermination() method. With this approach, the ExecutorService will first stop taking new tasks, then wait up to a specified period of time for all tasks to be completed. If that time expires, the execution is stopped immediately:

try {
    if (!executorService.awaitTermination(800, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)) {
} catch (InterruptedException e) {

5. The Future Interface

The submit() and invokeAll() methods return an object or a collection of objects of type Future, which allows us to get the result of a task's execution or to check the task's status (is it running or executed).

The Future interface provides a special blocking method get() which returns an actual result of the Callable task's execution or null in the case of Runnable task. Calling the get() method while the task is still running will cause execution to block until the task is properly executed and the result is available.

Future<String> future = executorService.submit(callableTask);
String result = null;
try {
    result = future.get();
} catch (InterruptedException | ExecutionException e) {

With very long blocking caused by the get() method, an application's performance can degrade. If the resulting data is not crucial, it is possible to avoid such a problem by using timeouts:

String result = future.get(200, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);

If the execution period is longer than specified (in this case 200 milliseconds), a TimeoutException will be thrown.

The isDone() method can be used to check if the assigned task is already processed or not.

The Future interface also provides for the cancellation of task execution with the cancel() method, and to check the cancellation with isCancelled() method:

boolean canceled = future.cancel(true);
boolean isCancelled = future.isCancelled();

6. The ScheduledExecutorService Interface

The ScheduledExecutorService runs tasks after some predefined delay and/or periodically. Once again, the best way to instantiate a ScheduledExecutorService is to use the factory methods of the Executors class.

For this section, a ScheduledExecutorService with one thread will be used:

ScheduledExecutorService executorService = Executors

To schedule a single task's execution after a fixed delay, us the scheduled() method of the ScheduledExecutorService. There are two scheduled() methods that allow you to execute Runnable or Callable tasks:

Future<String> resultFuture = 
  executorService.schedule(callableTask, 1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);

The scheduleAtFixedRate() method lets execute a task periodically after a fixed delay. The code above delays for one second before executing callableTask.

The following block of code will execute a task after an initial delay of 100 milliseconds, and after that, it will execute the same task every 450 milliseconds. If the processor needs more time to execute an assigned task than the period parameter of the scheduleAtFixedRate() method, the ScheduledExecutorService will wait until the current task is completed before starting the next:

Future<String> resultFuture = service
  .scheduleAtFixedRate(runnableTask, 100, 450, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);

If it is necessary to have a fixed length delay between iterations of the task, scheduleWithFixedDelay() should be used. For example, the following code will guarantee a 150-millisecond pause between the end of the current execution and the start of another one.

service.scheduleWithFixedDelay(task, 100, 150, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);

According to the scheduleAtFixedRate() and scheduleWithFixedDelay() method contracts, period execution of the task will end at the termination of the ExecutorService or if an exception is thrown during task execution.

7. ExecutorService vs. Fork/Join

After the release of Java 7, many developers decided that the ExecutorService framework should be replaced by the fork/join framework. This is not always the right decision, however. Despite the simplicity of usage and the frequent performance gains associated with fork/join, there is also a reduction in the amount of developer control over concurrent execution.

ExecutorService gives the developer the ability to control the number of generated threads and the granularity of tasks which should be executed by separate threads. The best use case for ExecutorService is the processing of independent tasks, such as transactions or requests according to the scheme “one thread for one task.”

In contrast, according to Oracle's documentation, fork/join was designed to speed up work which can be broken into smaller pieces recursively.

8. Conclusion

Even despite the relative simplicity of ExecutorService, there are a few common pitfalls. Let's summarize them:

Keeping an unused ExecutorService alive: There is a detailed explanation in section 4 of this article about how to shut down an ExecutorService;

Wrong thread-pool capacity while using fixed length thread-pool: It is very important to determine how many threads the application will need to execute tasks efficiently. A thread-pool that is too large will cause unnecessary overhead just to create threads which mostly will be in the waiting mode. Too few can make an application seem unresponsive because of long waiting periods for tasks in the queue;

Calling a Future‘s get() method after task cancellation: An attempt to get the result of an already canceled task will trigger a CancellationException.

Unexpectedly-long blocking with Future‘s get() method: Timeouts should be used to avoid unexpected waits.

The code for this article is available in a GitHub repository.

Java bottom

I just announced the new Learn Spring course, focused on the fundamentals of Spring 5 and Spring Boot 2:

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nicola Malizia
4 years ago

I remember that when I first learned the Executor Framework at my class it was very confusing and I had to read tons of slides to get it, this article instead summarize greatly the API of this framework. I enjoyed refreshing old knowledge by reading this.
TIL: Fork/Join Framework 😀

Eugen Paraschiv
4 years ago
Reply to  Nicola Malizia

Happy to help Nicola. Cheers and keep in touch,

Francois Marot
4 years ago

Just for the record, I have seen (even experienced) programmers mis-use Futures. They thought they were starting background tasks and thought (without ever any proof) they were improving the responsiveness of the app by writing (in pseudo code here):

Future myTask = createTask(…);
Object result = myTask.get();

I had to tell them that in fact they were only adding overhead as they wanted their task to be synchronous !
Async & multithreading is hard 😉
Thanks for the post.

Eugen Paraschiv
4 years ago
Reply to  Francois Marot

A good understanding of what you’re doing when you’re going async is definitely an important aspect – I fully agree. Cheers,

Comments are closed on this article!