What Are Regular Languages? | Baeldung on Computer Science

1. Introduction

In theoretical computer science, formal languages are used to model different types of computation and to study the properties of algorithms and automata. Regular languages, context-free languages, and Turing machine languages are some common examples of formal languages used in theoretical computer science.

In this tutorial, we’ll discuss regular languages – a class of formal languages that finite automata can recognize. We’ll also discuss regular languages’ characteristics, examples, and limitations.

2. Regular Languages

Regular languages are formal languages that regular expressions can describe and can also be recognized by finite automata. They are used to define sets of strings, such as sequences of characters or words, that follow specific patterns.

They are important in computer science and theoretical computer science because they form a foundation for understanding the theory of computation and the design of compilers and other software tools.

2.1. Formal Definition

Formally, a regular language can be defined as the collection of all strings that are recognized by a finite automata (FA).
An FA is a 5-tuple $(Q, \Sigma, \delta, q_0, F)$ , where:

$Q$ stands for a finite number of states
$\Sigma$ stands for a finite alphabet, representing the input symbols
$\delta$ stands for the transition function which maps $Q \times \Sigma$ to $Q$
$q_0$ stands for the initial state. It is one of the elements of $Q$
$F$ stands for the set of final states. F is also a subset of $Q$ .

FAs and regular expressions specify patterns or rules that define a language, such as sequences of characters that must or must not appear in the strings. The words in a regular language must follow the rules specified by the finite automaton or regular expression to be part of the language.

2.2. Examples of Regular Languages

Some common examples of regular languages include:

Binary strings that represent even numbers
Set of strings that contain exactly two a‘s
The set of all binary numbers that are divisible by 3
The set of all strings that contain the substring “01”

3. Characteristics of Regular Languages

Regular languages have several useful properties. Let’s discuss some of these properties.

3.1. Closure Properties

Regular languages are closed under union, concatenation, and Kleene star (zero or more repetitions). This means that if two regular languages are combined using one of these operations, the resulting language will also be regular.

Union: Let $L_1$ and $L_2$ be regular languages, then $L_1{\cup}L_2$ is a regular language
Concatenation: Let $L_1$ and $L_2$ be regular languages, then $L_1.L_2$ is a regular language
Kleene Star: Let $L$ be a regular language, then $L^*$ is a regular language

3.2. Regular Expressions

Regular expressions are a compact and convenient way to define regular languages. They use a set of special characters and operators to represent different types of strings and sets of strings.

Let’s consider the language $L$ defined by all strings that consist of an even number of 0’s. One way to define this language is by using a regular expression, as follows:

$1^*(01^*01^*)^*$

In this expression, the Kleene star operation “ $1^*$ “ matches any number of 1’s, while the inner expression “ $(01^*01^*)^*$ ” ensures the occurrence of an even number of 0’s and any number of 1’s. . The outer Kleene star operation ensures that the inner expression is repeated any number of times.

3.3. Equivalence With Finite Automata

A regular language can be recognized by a finite automata, which is a simple machine model consisting of states, transitions, and an initial and final state. Conversely, every regular language can be expressed using finite automata.

In the example we considered in section 3.2, an equivalent nondeterministic finite automaton (NFA) is shown next using a finite automata diagram (also known as a state diagram):

The NFA will only accept strings that end in the state $q_{0}$ , corresponding to an even number of 0’s in the string.

4. Proving a Language Is Regular or Not

There are several methods to determine whether a language is regular or not.

4.1. Pumping Lemma

The pumping lemma puts forward that for a regular language $L$ , there exists a constant “pump length” such that any string in the language can be decomposed into three parts and these parts can be repeated any number of times (by “pumping” the middle part) while still being in the language.

This can be stated mathematically as follows:

Let $L$ be a regular language, and $p$ be the constant “pump length” specified by the pumping lemma. Then, for any string $w$ in $L$ such that $|w| >= p$ , it can be decomposed into three parts:

$w = xyz$

where the following conditions must hold:

$|xy| <= p$
$|y| > 0$
For any non-negative integer $k, xy^kz$ is in $L$

4.2. Myhill-Nerode Theorem

The Myhill-Nerode theorem states that a language is regular if and only if the number of states in its minimal DFA (deterministic finite automata) is equal to that of its equivalent minimal NFA. If a language can be shown to have an infinite number of inequivalent strings, then it is not regular.

If a language can be shown to have an infinite number of inequivalent strings, then it is not regular.

The theorem is based on the concept of “inequivalent strings,” which are strings that are distinguishable by the minimal DFA. The theorem states that if there are an infinite number of inequivalent strings in a language, then that language is not regular.

Mathematically, let $L$ be a language and $Q$ a set of states in a DFA. Then the Myhill-Nerode theorem is stated as:

$L$ is regular if and only if there exists a DFA $(Q, \Sigma, \delta, q_0, F)$ such that ${L= L(A)}$ and ${|Q|=n}$ , where $n$ is the number of inequivalent strings in $L$ with respect to the DFA.

4.3. Closure Properties Check

The closure property ensures that all regular languages result in a regular language when subjected to operations such as union, concatenation, and Kleene star. This implies that if a language is not closed under these operations, it is not regular.

4.4. Proving Equivalence to a Context-Free Language (CFL)

If a language can be proven to be equivalent to a CFL, it is not regular. This is because CFLs are more powerful than regular languages and can describe a wider range of language structures.

5. Practical Applications of Regular Languages

There are many ways regular languages are used in computer science and related fields. A few examples include:

Pattern matching: They are often used in text editors, word processors, and programming languages for searching and manipulating strings that match a given pattern
Lexical analysis: Regular languages are used in the lexical analysis phase of compiler design to identify and tokenize keywords, identifiers, and other elements of a programming language
Input validation: Regular languages are used in programming to validate user input by checking if it matches a given pattern
Network protocols: Regular languages are used to define the syntax of messages in network protocols such as HTTP, FTP, and SMTP
DNA sequence analysis: Regular languages are used to analyze DNA sequences in bioinformatics

6. Limitations of Regular Languages

Limitations of regular languages include:

Less powerful formal language: Regular languages are a limited class of formal languages and are less powerful than other classes of languages, such as CFLs and context-sensitive languages
Unboundedness: Regular languages are limited to patterns that have a fixed length or can be described by a fixed number of repeating units
Expressiveness: Regular languages are not powerful enough to describe all computable functions or to model all kinds of data structures

Regular languages are a fundamental class of formal languages, but they are not powerful enough to describe many of the languages that arise in practice. They are useful for simple pattern matching and lexical analysis, but more complex languages require more powerful models

7. Conclusion

In this article, we discussed regular languages – a class of formal languages that finite automata can recognize. We also discussed regular languages’ characteristics, practical applications, and limitations.

Regular languages form a foundation for understanding the theory of computation and the design of compilers and other software tools. However, regular languages are a limited class of formal languages. They are less powerful than other classes, such as context-free languages and context-sensitive languages.

Full Archive

About Baeldung

Core Concepts

Operating Systems

Artificial Intelligence

Graph Theory

Latex