If you have a few years of experience in Computer Science or research, and you’re interested in sharing that experience with the community, have a look at our **Contribution Guidelines**.

# How to Get Bold Math Symbols in Latex

Last modified: October 28, 2022

## 1. Introduction

In this tutorial, we’ll show how to get bold math symbols in LaTeX.

For example, in scientific and math texts, we often use bold font for vectors and matrices to distinguish them from scalar values.

## 2. Example

Let’s say we have a math expression:

`(Ax - \alpha)^Tz = x \iff \left( \int_{a}^{b}cf(u)du \right) + \nabla \Psi_x = \Omega_x`

It looks like this:

There are several ways of making the symbols in it appear bold.

## 3. The *\mathbf* Command

We can use the *\mathbf* command, which is available in LaTeX by default. To use it, we apply it as any other command:

`\mathbf{symbols_or_command}`

For example, if we want to make , , and bold, we’ll apply *\mathbf* to them:

`(\mathbf{A}\mathbf{x} - \alpha)^T\mathbf{z} = \mathbf{x} \iff \left( \int_{a}^{b}cf(u)du \right) + \nabla \Psi_{\mathbf{x}} = \Omega_{\mathbf{x}}`

The result is:

which is what we wanted.

However, if we wanted to apply *\mathbf* to the entire expression, it wouldn’t work on all the symbols:

As we see, the lowercase alpha, parentheses, operators, and relation symbols stayed in the regular font.

## 4. The *\bm* Command

An alternative is the *\bm* command from the *bm* package. We can use it to make individual symbols bold:

`(\bm{A}\bm{x} - \bm{\alpha})^T\bm{z} = \bm{x} \iff \left( \int_{a}^{b}cf(u)du \right) + \nabla \Psi_{\bm{x}} = \Omega_{\bm{x}}`

which renders like this:

Or, if we want to apply bold to the entire expression:

`\bm{(Ax - \alpha)^Tz = x \iff \left( \int_{a}^{b}cf(u)du \right) + \nabla \Psi_x = \Omega_x}`

we get:

As we see, all the symbols are bold, and the spacing between them is as it should be.

For this command to work as intended, **we should load the bm package after any packages that define or load fonts.**

### 4.1. Unbolding Symbols

We may sometimes want to “unbold” symbols. For instance, let’s say we want to typeset the variable in using the standard math font but typeset the square root symbol using bold font. To achieve that, we apply *\bm* to the entire expression, *\sqrt{a}*, but unbold using *\unboldmath*:

`\bm{\sqrt{\mbox{\unboldmath$a$}}}`

This is the result:

**Unbolding is useful when we want to bold a command but not all its arguments.**

### 4.2. The Alias *\boldsymbol*

The package offers an alias of *\bm*, and that’s the *\boldsymbol* command. It’s intended to allow for a faster migration of documents using the command *\boldsymbol* from the AMS package *amsbsy*.

The difference between the two is that the command from the *bm* package is better at spacing.

### 4.3. Does *\bm* Always Work?

In general, **the \bm command can handle almost any input.** However, it can fail if we apply it to a complex command that confuses it when it tries to determine the correct spacing. In that case, we can add an extra set of curly braces around the command:

`\bm{{\cmd{args}}}`

Unfortunately, this messes up the spacing, so we need to position symbols manually.

## 5. *\mathbf* vs. *\bm *

The most important difference is that *\mathbf* doesn’t work on all symbols. The *\bm* command does.

Further, **they make symbols appear differently.** While *\bm* only adds boldness, thus preserving everything else from the original look of its arguments, *\mathbf* changes the symbols when making them bold:

## 6. Conclusion

In this article, we talked about bolding math symbols. **If we don’t want to load any additional package, we can use the \mathbf command, but it doesn’t work in all cases.** In contrast,

**the**However, the symbols don’t look the same way in these two approaches.

*\bm*command from the*bm*package is very flexible.